Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 11:20:53 -0800 (PST) From: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com> To: Darren Reed <darrenr@cyber.com.au> Cc: Ulf Zimmermann <ulf@pbinet.com>, darrenr@cyber.com.au, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ide problems Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960220112035.1181T-100000@nervosa.com> In-Reply-To: <199602201629.DAA00933@plum.cyber.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Feb 1996, Darren Reed wrote: > > > > wd0: interrupt timeout: > > > > wd0: status 58<seekdone,drq> error 0 > > > > wd0: interrupt timeout: > > > > wd0: status 50<seekdone> error 1<no_dam> > > > > > > > > 2.1.0-RELEASE/Pentium-100 > > I suspect "AUTO_EOI_1" and/or "AUTO_EOI_2". > > I've currently got a working kernel (no errors). > > darren > # # Options for `isa': # # AUTO_EOI_1 enables the `automatic EOI' feature for the master 8259A # interrupt controller. This saves about 1.25 usec for each interrupt. # No problems are known to be caused by this option. # # AUTO_EOI_2 enables the `automatic EOI' feature for the slave 8259A # interrupt controller. This saves about 1.25 usec for each interrupt. # Automatic EOI is documented not to work for for the slave with the # original i8259A, but it works for some clones and some integrated # versions. == Chris Layne ============================================================== == coredump@nervosa.com ================= http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960220112035.1181T-100000>