Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:05:00 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> Cc: Michiel Boland <michiel@boland.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, peter@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade 6-STABLE to -CURRENT on sparc64 renders box unusable Message-ID: <4693F47C.2040409@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20070710205314.GM55449@hoeg.nl> References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0707101403490.13827@neerbosch.nijmegen.internl.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0707101824231.15001@neerbosch.nijmegen.internl.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0707102211410.4947@neerbosch.nijmegen.internl.net> <20070710205314.GM55449@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Michiel Boland <michiel@boland.org> wrote:
>> --- __getosreldate.c.orig 2007-07-10 22:29:02.000000000 +0200
>> +++ __getosreldate.c 2007-07-10 22:28:20.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -42,13 +42,10 @@
>> int
>> __getosreldate(void)
>> {
>> - static int osreldate;
>> + int osreldate;
>> size_t len;
>> int oid[2];
>> int error, osrel;
>> -
>> - if (osreldate != 0)
>> - return (osreldate);
>>
>> oid[0] = CTL_KERN;
>> oid[1] = KERN_OSRELDATE;
>
> Isn't the problem solved by just initializing osreldate with zero?
>
I'm pretty sure that the osreldate should be automatically initialized
to zero since it's static. I wonder if this has been broken on sparc64
somehow.
Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4693F47C.2040409>