Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:17:50 -0600 (CST) From: Justin Dossey <jbd@cagemonkey.com> To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load average with CURRENT Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403100014440.3894@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20040308052530.M21071@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403071341580.23079@localhost.localdomain> <20040307145256.Q21071@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403071511500.23079@localhost.localdomain> <20040307155458.S21071@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403071859450.23079@localhost.localdomain> <20040308052530.M21071@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > > What scheduler are you using on this system? > > ULE. > > Does 4BSD exhibit the same behavior? No-- I just booted with the 4BSD scheduler and load average is back to normal. Given observations, I'm guessing I have an N+1 situation rather than an N*2 situation... -- Justin Dossey
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.58.0403100014440.3894>