Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 20:37:59 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> Cc: Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net>, FreeBSD-Stable <stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: backups of SUPERBLOCK Message-ID: <20021110043759.GA34320@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3DCDDFB1.D49327C6@kuzbass.ru> References: <20021109231607.W9701-100000@topperwein.pennasoft.com> <3DCDDFB1.D49327C6@kuzbass.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 11:25:21AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > If you didn't do any custom tuning with newfs, it's likely that > >=20 > > newfs -N -b 8192 -f 1024 # pre 4.6 > >=20 > > or > >=20 > > newfs -N -b 16384 -f 2048 # 4.6 and up > >=20 > > will be sufficient. >=20 > Yeah. But this system was set up in times when newfs did not optimize > cyl/group ratio and I remember that I manually run=20 > newfs with -b, -f and -c flags. Should I now worry about recovering those > values to get right output from newsf -N, or not?=20 > And if I should, how can I obtain all real values? dumpfs? Kris --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9zeKmWry0BWjoQKURAr97AJ0X3K5cUoK1J1qfub1+mFp7PzXaWgCgx/rm hr17CrAVZ+qnitMJbBPKoko= =WJlx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021110043759.GA34320>