Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 07:37:39 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> To: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf and /usr/local/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf (not repo names) Message-ID: <20250824073739.972b831b3278ff7e8f2f5bed@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <86jz2uvtt2.fsf@ltc.des.dev> References: <5dc99111-3977-4638-8151-1f69fa819e08@gmail.com> <20250823182819.321d4dbca45e56f7c1f0a7aa@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <93fa8633-3497-46db-9821-d5e57fd45ca8@gmail.com> <20250823213830.310f51c1c7d241dc3bc81963@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <86jz2uvtt2.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 19:20:25 +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> writes: > > I think pkg is quite irregular corner case. > > Indeed, it SHALL be the part of base, but as it is still under active > > developement, need to be in ports "until the spec prolerly fixed up". > > So exists /usr/sbin/pkg for bootstrapping. > > I don't know where you got that idea. It's in ports because it's > closely tied to the ports tree and has a different lifecycle than base. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.org I think you're right "until PkgBase is just under test". But now commits related with PkgBase is actively (than before) even on non-main branches like stable/14. An example below. https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?h=stable/14&id=d149be3a0cbe27599921b0952bd8de18413fceaf So it should be considered to be tied with base, too. The situation is already changed. This is my thought that made me to the conclusion. Regards. -- Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20250824073739.972b831b3278ff7e8f2f5bed>