Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:27:20 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Massimo Lusetti <massimo@cedoc.mo.it> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Heavy loaded network machine Message-ID: <20051201112720.GK22816@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <1133432561.4306.16.camel@massimo.datacode.it> References: <1133432561.4306.16.camel@massimo.datacode.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:22:41AM +0100, Massimo Lusetti wrote: M> Due to the latest thread on em interrupt storm i would like to know M> which is the recommended nic to choose to be deployed on a -STABLE M> M> Read "recommended" as: which works good without known wired behavior and M> has produced good performance over a gigabit wire The em(4) driver in STABLE is now in quite good state. We use it on heavy loaded routers. The interrupt storm in the thread you mention was probably caused by some bad hardware combination between mainboard and NIC. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051201112720.GK22816>