Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 04:18:48 -0500 From: Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net> To: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: FreeBSD Ports List <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: gettext vs gettext-devel Message-ID: <20020310091848.GA40427@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <1015751079.509.9.camel@notebook> References: <20020310034141.GA16921@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <1015751079.509.9.camel@notebook>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 11:08:42AM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >files. ports/devel/gettext-devel/pkg-plist is a stub, the real plist is >generated on the fly. Check ports/devel/gettext-devel/Makefile for >details. I caught that and corrected myself in a followup. It was the -plist that threw me off. >No, we can't use only one, because some ports only work with older one, >while some only with newer one, therefore we need both to make everyone >happy. That was basically what I wanted to know. But, if you'll indulge my curiosity: If you define WANT_FULL_GETTEXT, then they both produce libintl.so.1; are the two shared libs not compatible, or is it in the executables that the differences lie? Thanks. -- Alan Eldridge "Dave's not here, man." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020310091848.GA40427>