Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Oct 1999 20:27:40 +1300
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The eventual fate of BLOCK devices.
Message-ID:  <19991018202740.50929@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910141656420.17468-100000@current1.whistle.com>; from Julian Elischer on Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 05:04:58PM -0700
References:  <447.939897820@critter.freebsd.dk> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910141656420.17468-100000@current1.whistle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, 14 October 1999 at 17:04:58 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> Unless we have significant new information to the contrary, I will
>> commence the bdev removal after November 1st 1999.
>
> This is I think a bit "pushy" for such an important step.
> How about: "We will ask for a declaration of the right thing to do
> from Core, specifically, DG as Arbiter, (not as DG) on Novenber 1.
> So all arguments either way should be completed by that time."
>
> All sides involved should agree to let the matter rest after the decision
> has been reached.

I must say that I'm concerned about the evidence of Danish axes in
this discussion.  I do think that dg should get involved (probably as
dg), though I suppose Kirk's support for the idea makes it more likely
to happen.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991018202740.50929>