Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:41:37 -0800 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> To: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@freebsd.org> Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "Konstantin Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Odd behaviour on recent boot of 11.1 with timecounters Message-ID: <d4038b352a7522765c4b34cd9f76ddee@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20180102164526.GA63396@in-addr.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:45:26 +0000 "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@freebsd.org> said > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 06:47:38PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 03:49:13PM +0000, Gary Palmer wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 04:51:47PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 02:17:08PM +0000, Gary Palmer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I recently updated to 11.1-RELEASE-p6 and on the most recent reboot > > > > > (after rebuilding all the necessary packages) the clock was running > > > > > slow and NTP wouldn't sync. I looked in /var/log/messages and I found > > > > > that for some reason, on this latest boot, it got the frequency of > > > > > TSC-low wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Aug 24 04:55:35 my kernel: Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1746073190 > > Hz quality 1000 > > > > > Aug 26 03:11:38 my kernel: Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1746070760 > > Hz quality 1000 > > > > > Aug 26 14:12:46 my kernel: Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1746075204 > > Hz quality 1000 > > > > > Nov 19 16:01:09 my kernel: Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1746070746 > > Hz quality 1000 > > > > > Dec 27 22:28:00 my kernel: Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1746074808 > > Hz quality 1000 > > > > > Dec 27 22:51:12 my kernel: Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1746071892 > > Hz quality 1000 > > > > > Dec 28 12:50:46 my kernel: Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1746069704 > > Hz quality 1000 > > > > > Dec 28 14:03:52 my kernel: Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1937876448 > > Hz quality 1000 > > > > > > > > > > Until the December reboots the machine was running 10.x. Dec 27 and > > later > > > > > are part of the process to get up to 11.x. > > > > > > > > > > Any idea why the TSC-low frequency jumped 191,806,744Hz on the last > > > > > measurement? > > > > > > > > > > I switched to HPET temporarily via sysctl and ntp seems happy. I'm > > just > > > > > concerned that the problem might recur on later reboots as TSC-low > > seems > > > > > to be the preferred timecounter. > > > > > > > > Show first 100 lines of the dmesg from a verbose boot. > > > > Also check BIOS settings related to overclocking and powersaving. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Konstantin, > > > > > > BIOS settings haven't been changed in 4+ years. No overclocking, and > > > all powersaving options are at "auto" or "disabled". > > > > > > The first 100 lines of verbose dmesg didn't seem that interesting so > > > I've included up to the end of "Device configuration finished" > > > > > > Note that this boot didn't have the TSC-low problem, and the boot > > > that had it wasn't verbose unfortunately. > > > > It is really the CPU identification which I wanted to see. You have > > IvyBridge, which is known to have good TSC. > > Ah > > > Try to obtain verbose dmesg with mis-identified frequency. > > Tried, and failed after 20+ reboots. I've left > > boot_verbose=" -v" I believe that should read: boot_verbose="YES" but maybe just the occurrence of something makes it a positive. > > in /boot/loader.conf to catch any boot-time wonkiness and undone it at > runtime with > > debug.bootverbose=0 > > in /etc/sysctl.conf as I found that the snd_hda driver is ... chatty > at runtime. > > Thanks, > > Gary > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d4038b352a7522765c4b34cd9f76ddee>