Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:48:33 -0600
From:      John Hein <jhein@timing.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pthread_cleanup_push & pthread_cleanup_pop usage
Message-ID:  <18669.3729.459915.769388@gromit.timing.com>
In-Reply-To: <200810081409.31822.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <18668.10465.699531.162573@gromit.timing.com> <200810081409.31822.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote at 14:09 -0400 on Oct  8, 2008:
 > Don't Do That (tm).  The spec explicitly states that they can be defined as 
 > macros and that code using it needs to put them in the same block.

Thanks for the responses.  I like deischen's response best to work
around the problem short term, but I suspect that's not very portable.
And as jhb describes using it outside the same block violates the
spirit of intended use.

Note that the example I gave (pop off the cleanup stack in a catch
block) is not our only "violation".  We also push in one function and
either never [explicitly] pop or possibly pop in another function.

So that leaves me wondering about possible techniques for cleanup on
thread cancellation or exit.  Alfred touched on one method, and I see
that pthread_key_create takes an optional destructor, so that sounds
like a possible avenue to explore.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18669.3729.459915.769388>