Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 04:22:54 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: ache@nagual.pp.ru Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick Makefile ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/files md5 ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/patches patch-aa ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <199808221122.EAA14209@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <19980822064956.A11014@nagual.pp.ru> (ache@nagual.pp.ru)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > We can't keep it because it is duplicated in ImageMagick. * > It was the reason for delete. * > If you ever attempt to keep it, you'll got version mismatch in near * > future, since both ports overwrite the same files. I've never argued that. I'm just saying it's common courtesy for you to talk to the maintainer first. * > If we say A, the we need to say B, instead lots of junk files and version * > mismatch occurse. I not say A, I just say B. I can't parse that at all. * In any case we have a possibility to discuss this issue with maintainers * _before_ deletion occurse if you explain your point of view as answer on * my request instead of simple ignoring it. My point of view, as I stated over and over before, is that you have to talk to maintainers before committing controversial changes. Since you seem to have a rather narrow sense of common courtesy, and many people have complained in the past, let me state a clear rule for you. You "ache" always have to get the permission of the maintainer before you commit to a port maintained by anyone else. There are to be no exceptions. If you have a dispute with the maintainer, *then* come to me. Otherwise, please leave it up to the maintainer. Is that clear enough? Thank you for your cooperation. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808221122.EAA14209>