Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:21:36 -0500 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x Message-ID: <20080220092136.4dee013b.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <fphbcf$f3l$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20080214114759.R75215@mail.rsts.org> <20080214151614.7fa0c091.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <fphbcf$f3l$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In response to Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>: > Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to Brett Bump <bbump@rsts.org>: > >> I'm seeing signal 6's on apache and imapd (never happened before) > >> network errors, serious response time errors and generally poor > >> performance during peak activity (same box, same people). > > > > IIRC, signal 6 is an indicator that you've compiled binaries that are > > almost, but not quite compatible with your CPU. > > You probably mean signals 4 (SIGILL) or 10 (SIGBUS), rather than 6 > (SIGABRT) :) > > I was getting a lot of SIGABRTs once, but that turned out to be due to > PHP module order bogosity and linking mismatched threaded libraries into > apache. You're quite likely correct. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080220092136.4dee013b.wmoran>