Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:29:21 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        mav@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Multiple hpet messages during boot
Message-ID:  <20100917.092921.741671742025249057.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C911214.7060406@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <mailpost.1284533367.9527854.69639.mailing.freebsd.current@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> <4C911214.7060406@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <4C911214.7060406@FreeBSD.org>
            Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Joel Dahl wrote:
: > I noticed this during boot (HEAD from yesterday):
: > 
: > hpet0: [FILTER]
: > hpet0: [FILTER]
: > hpet0: [FILTER]
: > hpet0: [FILTER]
: > hpet0: [FILTER]
: > hpet0: [FILTER]
: > hpet0: [FILTER]
: > hpet0: [FILTER]
: > 
: > Is it really necessary to print this 8 times?
: 
: HPET at present chipsets may use up to 8 IRQs. Driver registers filter
: interrupt handlers for them. Interrupt handling code prints this.
: 
: If you boot with verbose, you may see that some network cards prints
: alike things for the number of supported MSI/MSI-X interrupts.

Is there any reason not to toss all FILTER messages behind
bootverbose?

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100917.092921.741671742025249057.imp>