Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:50:53 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How about gcj? (Re: Not committing WARNS settings...) Message-ID: <20020207105053.C64102@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020207193936.C19376@freebie.xs4all.nl>; from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl on Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:39:36PM %2B0100 References: <20020206192238.B3347@dragon.nuxi.com> <200202070539.g175dbQ22609@aldan.algebra.com> <20020207101133.B53237@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020207192957.B19376@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20020207103541.D53237@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020207193936.C19376@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:39:36PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > 3.1 will also be slower on the Alpha. It is really an issue of the code > > generator. Generating x86 code on an Alpha is faster than generating > > [native] Alpha code. The Alpha code generator is slow. It may be that > > all 64 bit or RISC GCC code generation is slow -- we will see soon for > > the sparc64. > > Thanks. So it is the code generator itself, I always thought it would be > the optimiser that needs more time to do a decent job on a RISC. I lumped those two together. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020207105053.C64102>