Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 19:01:18 -0700 (MST) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: grog@lemis.com, ken@plutotech.com, paulz@trantor.xs4all.nl, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Slow seq. write on Seagate ST36530N Message-ID: <199902210201.TAA16287@panzer.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9902201651370.31494-100000@feral-gw> from Matthew Jacob at "Feb 20, 1999 4:52:34 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob wrote... > > On Saturday, 20 February 1999 at 17:21:19 -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > Matthew Jacob wrote... > > >> > > >> If you're feeling kind, could you try and see if you could get a > > >> performance curve related to the number of outstanding tags allowed? > > > > > > I will send him some diffs for camcontrol in a separate piece of mail that > > > will enable him to change the number of tags on the fly. > > > > Now that sounds like a good idea. Do you plan to roll them into the > > distribution camcontrol? > > > > It sounds like a good idea, and it is. What I want to see is scsi_da use > this automatically. I have never liked the "punch it, Chewey!" approach > CAM has been taking..... What do you mean "scsi_da use this automatically"? All of the tagged queueing stuff is controlled in the transport layer. What are you proposing that the DA driver do? Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902210201.TAA16287>