Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 19:32:10 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com> To: Glen Foster <gfoster@osmre.gov> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Release stability Message-ID: <20626.798431530@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Apr 95 12:47:13 EDT." <199504201647.MAA18678@nomad.osmre.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Features are nice to have but the measure of any operating system is > how dependable it is. In my book features account for about 20% and > dependability (in which I include both predictability and stability) > about 80% of the "quality" of a release. Please, please, please do > not compromise the quality of 2.1. Just to set that particular record straight, no one here has even mentioned compromising the quality of 2.1. In fact, it's that very unwillingness to compromise its quality that has led us to push its release date out into July. We're now talking about an interim release to take some of the heat off! Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20626.798431530>