Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:34:17 +0200 From: Rafael NAVAZA <rnavaza@hotmail.com> To: freebsd questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: OpenLDAP + CARP Message-ID: <DUB102-W558C788E9EB2149ADD3C7BBE0D0@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <CALBk6yKroxA6DocgERukE1nHK1Gvnc8KCw97i7UnsWKMiUgmGg@mail.gmail.com> References: <DUB102-W60312A9A530D84FC783777BE0B0@phx.gbl>, <4E784905.1080007@infracaninophile.co.uk>, <DUB102-W57786E3DD32C6528A794D0BE0A0@phx.gbl>, <CALBk6yKroxA6DocgERukE1nHK1Gvnc8KCw97i7UnsWKMiUgmGg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > > > I'm indeed using the built in > > failover capability of LDAP clients. It works just fine when the first > > LDAP server is powered off, but it does not work that well when slapd > > becomes a zombi ( because the clients take about 1 min to try the second > > LDAP server, for each request, every time ... ) > > It is for that reason I'm interested in building a HA cluster for OpenLDAP. > > > > > > Could this help in your situation? > > http://www.liquidx.net/blog/2006/04/03/nss_ldap-undocumented-nss_reconnect_tries/ > Hello Brandon, That is a client side solution for Linux and I have several other OSs that use LDAP. But I remember some users at work that sometimes had udev timeout when booting their CentOS 5 workstation, thank you for the link. Rafael.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DUB102-W558C788E9EB2149ADD3C7BBE0D0>