Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Feb 2014 23:35:28 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com>
Cc:        Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: opteron a1100 arm
Message-ID:  <20140204223528.GF23872@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <493DEB39-C4B4-409E-B8B2-B1B11E013754@netgate.com>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401311911120.2427@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1391538649.19169.79261269.3C5F49D1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAFU734xXWyc_TqBJ7e4MhD2nB01BAejR_1vT9%2B_5Ar5mJncncA@mail.gmail.com> <493DEB39-C4B4-409E-B8B2-B1B11E013754@netgate.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 03:21:03PM -0600, Jim Thompson wrote:
> 
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:00 PM, Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 4 Feb 2014 19:31, "Mark Felder" <feld@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014, at 12:13, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>> AMD just presented it's ARM based CPU and motherboard. is support in
> >>> FreeBSD planned and what is it's status?
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Is it even available to purchase?
> > 
> > No but it may well be an early reminder of the upcoming generation of
> > powerful ARM servers that we don't want to leave unsupported.
> 
> “may well be” isn’t that attractive when the 8-core, 64-bit Intel C2000 parts are here, now, at a lower TDP
> (20W, .vs 25W for the a1100.  22nm rocks). 
> 
> When Intel moves the C2K series to 14nm later this year, the power savings will close the door.
> 
> The opteron a1100 samples in March, I wouldn’t expect boards before Summer.
> 
> Jim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

A board like this will allow portmgr to provide official and regular package
built for arm! so yes for sure we do need to support that!

regards,
Bapt

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlLxazAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzbrwCgt0Pdk2LNdrQbZtIJUZB2eFTd
9HAAoJuSH9asQ2eCSdUrn4avzoKcm7Wd
=JPE+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140204223528.GF23872>