Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 23:35:28 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> Cc: Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opteron a1100 arm Message-ID: <20140204223528.GF23872@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <493DEB39-C4B4-409E-B8B2-B1B11E013754@netgate.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401311911120.2427@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1391538649.19169.79261269.3C5F49D1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAFU734xXWyc_TqBJ7e4MhD2nB01BAejR_1vT9%2B_5Ar5mJncncA@mail.gmail.com> <493DEB39-C4B4-409E-B8B2-B1B11E013754@netgate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 03:21:03PM -0600, Jim Thompson wrote: >=20 > On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:00 PM, Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > > On 4 Feb 2014 19:31, "Mark Felder" <feld@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>=20 > >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014, at 12:13, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>> AMD just presented it's ARM based CPU and motherboard. is support in > >>> FreeBSD planned and what is it's status? > >>>=20 > >>=20 > >> Is it even available to purchase? > >=20 > > No but it may well be an early reminder of the upcoming generation of > > powerful ARM servers that we don't want to leave unsupported. >=20 > =E2=80=9Cmay well be=E2=80=9D isn=E2=80=99t that attractive when the 8-co= re, 64-bit Intel C2000 parts are here, now, at a lower TDP > (20W, .vs 25W for the a1100. 22nm rocks).=20 >=20 > When Intel moves the C2K series to 14nm later this year, the power saving= s will close the door. >=20 > The opteron a1100 samples in March, I wouldn=E2=80=99t expect boards befo= re Summer. >=20 > Jim >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" A board like this will allow portmgr to provide official and regular package built for arm! so yes for sure we do need to support that! regards, Bapt --GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlLxazAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzbrwCgt0Pdk2LNdrQbZtIJUZB2eFTd 9HAAoJuSH9asQ2eCSdUrn4avzoKcm7Wd =JPE+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GV0iVqYguTV4Q9ER--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140204223528.GF23872>