Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:25:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: spam maps <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 & bind9: named.conf vs. named.sample ; why are they different? Message-ID: <20041004132346.T778@bo.vpnaa.bet> In-Reply-To: <20041003124710.30828.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20041003124710.30828.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, spam maps wrote:
> I have these two files in /var/named/etc/namedb, but
> are different.
> Is /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf redundant and old?
If you've mergemaster'ed recently, named.conf will be the new one.
> # diff -u /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
> /var/named/etc/namedb/named.sample
We've never had a named.sample file in the tree. That is almost
certainly something that you, or someone else working on that box
created, probably by renaming an old named.conf.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041004132346.T778>