Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:01:59 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] Message-ID: <20050729220159.GA79524@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> References: <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# linimon@lonesome.com / 2005-07-29 15:33:24 -0500:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:21:58PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > From where I'm standing, bringing the port in (even "unmaintained")
> > looks like a win.
>
> Then we're going to have to agree to disagree.
Aye aye, sir, it was my pleasure.
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050729220159.GA79524>