Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 21:24:38 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LINT is missing examples for sio1-3 ? GENERIC does so Message-ID: <8298.884064278@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Jan 1998 12:15:21 %2B1100." <199801060115.MAA16752@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> No. LINT is suppose to have the minimal number of entries to give an > instance of each type. Only a few bogus entries breake this rule (grep > for [a-z]1). But what about showing also different instance/flag combinations? I don't see how it hurts to do that as separate entries if the alternative is to muddy a single entry to the point of confusion. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8298.884064278>