Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:39:40 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it possible to make subr_acl_nfs4 and subr_acl_posix1e disabled? Message-ID: <86ty4a8mc3.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=qNu9KpF6kSofychNcjwexFKvAT8bnwd3gVr-VPymN5w@mail.gmail.com> (Adrian Chadd's message of "Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:57:44 -0800") References: <CAJ-Vmo=qNu9KpF6kSofychNcjwexFKvAT8bnwd3gVr-VPymN5w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> writes: > Since I'm not using NFS or UFS_ACL, I wondered if that code required. > It turns out I can just build a kernel with those two disabled. > > Would it be possible to remove them from "standard" and make them > optional? Or is there a reason to keep it in base? I would be very annoyed if it were no longer possible to netboot GENERIC... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ty4a8mc3.fsf>