Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 21:19:13 +0300 From: Alex Lyashkov <shadow@psoft.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: code cleanup Message-ID: <1083176353.9714.44.camel@berloga.shadowland> In-Reply-To: <200404281329.16675.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <1083133582.8250.38.camel@berloga.shadowland> <200404281329.16675.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
÷ óÒÄ, 28.04.2004, × 20:29, John Baldwin ÐÉÛÅÔ: > On Wednesday 28 April 2004 02:26 am, Alex Lyashkov wrote: > > Hi All > > > > how i see many points at kernel work with allproc list direct, but > > proc.h introduce macros FOREACH_PROC_IN_SYSTEM. > > This patch clean this places. > > I'd actually rather see the FOREACH_PROC macro removed, I don't think hiding > the fact that it's a TAILQ is all that useful. It very very better if implemented per jail process list and process count limit. I started job with porting freevps project to FreeBSD platform and this patch help me with it. I think more easy change one place in headers than many places in code who have work direct with list. -- Alex Lyashkov <shadow@psoft.net> PSofthelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1083176353.9714.44.camel>