Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 17:22:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NETGRAPH in GENERIC? Message-ID: <200004202122.RAA06496@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000420134005.32667F-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000420134005.32667F-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:43:22 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> said: > I was wondering what objections there would be to such a change, and > whether people think this is a good idea. This sounds like a good idea to me. I'm not particularly fond of Netgraph, personally, but it's a good deal better than the alternatives. (If cable-modem open access comes about, expect to see those vendors doing PPPoE as well. Ick.) -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004202122.RAA06496>