Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 22:34:11 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: onitoring named Message-ID: <20010514223411.A95997@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <009801c0dcff$db26d3e0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>; from tedm@toybox.placo.com on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 10:28:21PM -0700 References: <20010514204716.A94166@xor.obsecurity.org> <009801c0dcff$db26d3e0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 10:28:21PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway > > > >Yes, there are in general lots of reasons why things like named dump > >core, but in the case of named it's (at the present time) most likely > >to be the reason already given, and once that's ruled out analysis can > >proceed to other causes. > > > > Spoken like someone who is more interested in seeing the world's > nameservers running an invulnerable version of Bind than in actually > fixing problems. While frustrating crackers is a laudable goal, you > might as well just be honest and come right out and say it! ;-) And how are they mutually exclusive things? Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7AL/TWry0BWjoQKURAtqkAKDv9Q4+Nsr9s3K5xN/Rjj9VhYP9jgCgx39k vKJLXNzLU9SQ3bjuT8gGsO4= =VvLU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010514223411.A95997>