Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:09:28 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Steve Sizemore <steve@ls.berkeley.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Re: NFS -current Message-ID: <3E82B1B8.65D4375B@mindspring.com> References: <200303260034.aa92057@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <3E81160B.E5406C60@mindspring.com> <20030326035938.GF1713@dan.emsphone.com> <3E816243.AED1CB4F@mindspring.com> <20030327070317.GA19434@math.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve Sizemore wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:18:11AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > In fact, the only legitimate argument I have ever heard for UDP > > has been "I have an old Linux install that can't talk TCP, as > > only UDP was implemented at the time I installed it". > > Have you already forgotten the locking problem that you were > helping me with last week? The only solution was to use UDP. Working around a screwed up implementation is not a "legitimate" argument. The only legitimate argument to that is "unscrewing" the implementation. 8-). -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E82B1B8.65D4375B>