Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:41:41 -0500 From: Kurt Miller <kurt@intricatesoftware.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Cc: "Arne H. Juul" <arnej@pvv.ntnu.no> Subject: Re: patch: fix and re-enable curthread hash lookup Message-ID: <200702261141.42579.kurt@intricatesoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0702260706120.28730@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no> References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0702222353520.12961@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no> <200702252138.46660.lists@intricatesoftware.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0702260706120.28730@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 26 February 2007 1:12 am, Arne H. Juul wrote: > On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Kurt Miller wrote: > > On Thursday 22 February 2007 6:10 pm, Arne H. Juul wrote: > >> This patch is still experimental, so if people can take a look at it and > >> tell me about any problems they can spot that would be much appreciated. > > > > Hi, > > > > I tried to apply the diff but all parts were rejected. > > Can you send this again in unified format? I don't mind > > applying it manually but I only grock unified diffs. :-) > > actually I made unified diff first, and found that the important > parts were too unreadable there, that's why I made a context diff... > > it *should* apply cleanly to 1.5.0 SCSL sources + BSD patchkit 4, > here it is again in unified format: Ahh I see what's going on. Your MUA is converting tabs to spaces (or perhaps you copied and pasted the diffs in and that converted tabs to spaces). Even applying the diff with -l I had rejects. I've applied the rejects manually but if you make the diff available on your web site it will allow others to test it easily. -Kurt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702261141.42579.kurt>