Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:56:35 +0100 From: Jonathan Anderson <jonathan@FreeBSD.org> To: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>, toolchain@freebsd.org, "=?utf-8?Q?freebsd-current=40freebsd.org_CURRENT?=" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com> Subject: Re: GCC withdraw Message-ID: <3C11736737A54D84B80B1D27406F8039@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <ADADF693-B140-4C87-B464-9F139B31E7B5@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <CAOFF%2BZ3vbOgMO7T-BKZnhKte6=rFoGcdYcft5kpAgNH2my1JKg@mail.gmail.com> <DC41B4BD-159A-408B-804A-0230F3E0E52B@FreeBSD.org> <201308291057.43027.jhb@freebsd.org> <8F836479-BC3A-4679-A7AA-3BCDD34AE6C5@FreeBSD.org> <52204746.2070900@freebsd.org> <ADADF693-B140-4C87-B464-9F139B31E7B5@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 08:35, David Chisnall wrote: > I would be happy to ship gcc, as long as: > > - It's explicitly marked as deprecated and due for removal at some point in the 10.x timeframe. > - libstdc++ is gone (the amount of pain it's causing ports is phenomenal). Wouldn't this mean that we can't build base using the shipped-in-base g++? If we have C++ in base, we don't ship libstdc++ and g++ can't work with libc++, then people wanting to compile the base system with gcc/g++ will have to install a libstdc++ package. I don't see how that's very different from requiring a gcc/g++ package. Jon -- Jonathan Anderson jonathan@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C11736737A54D84B80B1D27406F8039>