Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:52:38 -0700 From: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Two Junior Kernel Hacker tasks.. Message-ID: <20010624005238.D27083@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010622121136.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:11:36PM -0700 References: <200106221842.f5MIgaV58508@harmony.village.org> <XFMail.010622121136.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:11:36PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 22-Jun-01 Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message <XFMail.010622105201.jhb@FreeBSD.org> John Baldwin writes:
> >: 2) Build kernels in sys/compile/${MACHINE_ARCH}/FOO rather than
> >: sys/compile/FOO.
> >
> > Please use ${MACHINE}, not ${MACHINE_ARCH}. That way I can build
> > GENERIC for both i386 and pc98 at the same time without resorting to
> > the GENERIC98 hack I use now.
>
> Sure, sounds good. Actually, with mjacob's suggestion, I would go with
> sys/${MACHINE}/compile/FOO
pc98 and powerpc variations will make this ugly.
> I would tackle the sys/arch bikeshed on its own merits for now. (BTW,
> I favor sys/arch FWIW). If we use the path I proposed above
> (sys/MACHINE/compile/FOO) then if we do a sys/MACHINE ->
> sys/arch/MACHINE move we get the compile directory move for free.
PUKE, GROSS. NO.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010624005238.D27083>