Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:54:34 +0000 From: Peter Wood <peter@alastria.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update on running FreeBSD on xen Message-ID: <43BB9B5A.1030609@alastria.net> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170601031801q349adbbfyb65b61cfdb486cc6@mail.gmail.com> References: <b1fa29170601031746k2f2e4b94r548c4ff5a2979599@mail.gmail.com> <b1fa29170601031801q349adbbfyb65b61cfdb486cc6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Good Morning Kip et al, >The curious can track its status (known bugs, feature plans, release plans, >etc.) at: >http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/STATUS > > I've been watching this website since just before Christmas and have been somewhat excited by the progress you're making. I'm looking forward to the days of a FreeBSD dom0. I have a quick question about a comment in your STATUS file. You wrote: >PAE support will be a function of demand The server in particular have in mind is a dual Xeon which will take up to 16Gb of ram, I've been planning to upgrade it to 8Gb and put Xen on it. At which point (as I understand it) I would need PAE. From a selfish point of view I'd like to see PAE support for dom0 (I don't imagin allocating 4Gb+ to domUs). Thanks for all your work on this Kip, I wish I could help out, but unfortuantly I'm missing sufficent kernel clue, more then happy to be a guineepig though. Cheers, Pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43BB9B5A.1030609>