Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:09:49 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 129965] [patch] ps(1): ps -lH doesn't show the proper CPU# Message-ID: <bug-129965-227-v28Gx6KiQ4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-129965-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-129965-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D129965 --- Comment #6 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: pstef Date: Sat Jun 27 19:09:34 UTC 2020 New revision: 362705 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362705 Log: ps(1): reuse keyword "cpu" to show CPU number This flag will now show the processor number on which a process is runnin= g. This change was inspired by PR129965. Initially I didn't think that the patch attached to it was correct -- it sacrificed ki_estcpu use in "cpu" for ki_lastcpu and I thought that the old functionality should be kept and the new (cpu#) one added to it. But I've since discovered that ki_estcpu = is sched_4bsd-specific. What's worse, it represents the same thing as ki_pctcpu, except ki_pctcpu is universal -- so "%cpu" has been using it successfully. Therefore, I've decided to replace information based on ki_estcpu with information based on ki_oncpu/ki_lastcpu. Key parts of the code and manual changes were borrowed from top(1). PR: 129965 Reported by: Nikola Kne?evi? MFC after: 1 week Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25377 Changes: head/bin/ps/extern.h head/bin/ps/keyword.c head/bin/ps/print.c head/bin/ps/ps.1 head/bin/ps/ps.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-129965-227-v28Gx6KiQ4>