Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Jul 2002 00:50:27 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: -current results (was something funny with soft updates?)
Message-ID:  <20020703005027.A4006@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200207030601.g6361E5E010289@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:01:14PM -0700
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0206281233500.75410-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <200207020314.g623Eke5038019@apollo.backplane.com> <20020702164756.E70767@dragon.nuxi.com> <200207030106.g6316Rwp008905@apollo.backplane.com> <20020702182303.A94386@dragon.nuxi.com> <200207030601.g6361E5E010289@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:01:14PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> 	(csh built with GCC2, -O3)
>     test3:/home/dillon> time ./x.csh
>     0.832u 0.848s 0:01.68 99.4%     881+645k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>     test3:/home/dillon> time ./x.csh
>     0.926u 0.755s 0:01.68 99.4%     889+654k 0+0io 0pf+0w
> 
> 	(csh built with GCC3, -O3)

You aren't taking advantage of what GCC 3.1 gives you.  Try optimizing
for your CPU also, -march=pentium4.  Also the extra slowdown with Gcc 3.1
is all the changes needed in the backend to handle ISO-C++ and Java.  I
guess I should just stay out of this type of discussion... but I hate it
when people are extra-critical about a piece of software w/o learning
something about it first.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020703005027.A4006>