Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 16:21:29 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Cc: jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, ejs@bfd.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <199703022121.QAA10831@crh.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199703022102.NAA06453@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Mar 2, 97 01:02:49 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> Cool!
>
> I got hold of a 2.1 machine and recompiled the binary
> this is what I am getting:
>
> {hasty} ./client -m
> rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> rc5-56-client: Complete in 2.614 seconds. (382627.93 keys/sec)
> {hasty} ./client -m
> rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> rc5-56-client: Complete in 2.566 seconds. (389699.01 keys/sec)
> {hasty}
>
> Now a client compiled on my 3.0 box:
>
> {hasty} ./client -m
> rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> rc5-56-client: Complete in 4.449 seconds. (224788.41 keys/sec)
You need to now update your stats on vex :) What IS vex anyway? And how did
it become associated with us FreeBSD folk?
-Crh
Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu
http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703022121.QAA10831>