Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:52:13 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inconsistency and bug with *chflags functions Message-ID: <AANLkTikGD8ofWKvhnVp2LW%2B_Lcqt_SS4z6OatyfanxeO@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201101180116.p0I1G47e064477@chez.mckusick.com> References: <AANLkTintj_eM=aRF4pO8PcT8VXvVJ=Booxag%2BwBg3gaX@mail.gmail.com> <201101180116.p0I1G47e064477@chez.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> wrote:
> Your change looks like a step forward to me. My recommendation
> is to do it.
Hi Kirk!
Thanks for the review! FWIW, I completely overlooked fflagstostr
and strtofflags so unfortunately my patch has grown a bit (a few
hundred lines). Once I have things squared away (amd64 and i386 passes
make tinderbox without issues), I'll resubmit another patch just for
review.
Thanks!
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikGD8ofWKvhnVp2LW%2B_Lcqt_SS4z6OatyfanxeO>