Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:44:47 +0000 From: Joe Holden <lists@rewt.org.uk> To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server Message-ID: <4EEAE8DF.40303@rewt.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <CACqU3MWiMpUNJ9d2t=OxfDHD47evvkgKcwLkiNBgEheWFJrzjw@mail.gmail.com> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ%2BzdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> <CAFHbX1%2B5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com> <4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAPjTQNEJDE17TLH-mDrG_-_Qa9R5N3mSeXSYYWtqz_DFidzYQw@mail.gmail.com> <20111215024249.GA13557@icarus.home.lan> <4EE9A2A0.80607@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CACqU3MWiMpUNJ9d2t=OxfDHD47evvkgKcwLkiNBgEheWFJrzjw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann > <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today: >> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA >> > it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is > using a kernel + compiler almost 2 years old, it still manages to > out-perform the bleeding edge FreeBSD :-) > serenity# gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] serenity# uname -r 9.0-RC3 > Now, from what I've read so far in this thread, it seems that a lot of > people are still in abnegation... > > my 0.2c, > - Arnaud > >> It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts of >> the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is simply far beyond >> disapointing, it is more than inacceptable and by just reading those >> benchmarks, I'd like to drop thinking of using FreeBSD even as a backend >> server in scientific and business environments. In detail, some of the >> SciMark benches look disappointing. The overall image can't help over >> the fact that in C-Ray FreeBSD is better performing. >> >> From the compiler, I'd like say there couldn't be a drop of more than 10 >> - 15% in performance - but not 10 or 100 times. >> >> I'm just thinking about the discussion of SCHED_ULE and all the saur >> spots we discussed when I stumbled over the test. >> >> Regards, >> Oliver >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EEAE8DF.40303>