Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:52:49 +0000 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Eric van Gyzen <vangyzen@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make universe and /etc/src.conf Message-ID: <20160822155249.GA765@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4005101b-0f6d-0212-1309-006a094e4b20@FreeBSD.org> References: <ad2f7a3b-21c5-2e2a-2f1b-0625a70e05f7@FreeBSD.org> <20160822152709.GY765@FreeBSD.org> <4005101b-0f6d-0212-1309-006a094e4b20@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 08:47:06AM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/22/2016 8:27 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:24:25AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> >> I just tried a "make universe", and all the kernels failed because they couldn't
> >> find the config files. I had forgotten that I have this in /etc/src.conf:
> >>
> >> KERNCONF=NUMA
> >> KERNCONFDIR=/etc
> >>
> >> Since "make universe" is primarily used for build-testing changes in src,
> >> shouldn't it ignore /etc/src.conf (and possibly /etc/src-env.conf), like the
> >> following? Or is "make universe" used for other purposes for which it really
> >> should read /etc/src*.conf?
>
> I disagree. Universe has read src.conf for a long time, and not
> make.conf which is more system-specific. Perhaps you should move your
> KERNCONF* to make.conf.
>
Ah, thank you, I missed the configuration file mentioned above.
> >>
> >> --- Makefile (revision 304226)
> >> +++ Makefile (working copy)
> >> @@ -479,6 +479,7 @@
> >> universe_${target}_${target_arch}: universe_${target}_prologue .MAKE .PHONY
> >> @echo ">> ${target}.${target_arch} ${UNIVERSE_TARGET} started on `LC_ALL=C date`"
> >> @(cd ${.CURDIR} && env __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null \
> >> + SRCCONF=/dev/null SRC_ENV_CONF=/dev/null \
> >> ${SUB_MAKE} ${JFLAG} ${UNIVERSE_TARGET} \
> >> TARGET=${target} \
> >> TARGET_ARCH=${target_arch} \
> >>
> >
> > I'm CC-ing bdrewery@ who did a bunch of /etc/src-env.conf work. I don't
> > *think* it was supposed to be required. I might be wrong, though.
> >
>
> This isn't src-env-specific though.
>
Indeed, thank you for the prompt reply.
Glen
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=VjHS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160822155249.GA765>