Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:41:52 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW8gbcWCb2R5Y2ggYmFuZHl0w7N3?= <radiomlodychbandytow@o2.pl> To: Matt Thyer <matt.thyer@gmail.com> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out Message-ID: <4F3010E0.6060302@o2.pl> In-Reply-To: <CACM2%2B-5GmdZYnfsU%2BukbcT%2B0-6g34YD3st9sGT-aZ0Uxcq7u7Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120130214146.19B3D1065754@hub.freebsd.org> <4F2EA461.7050308@o2.pl> <CACM2%2B-5GmdZYnfsU%2BukbcT%2B0-6g34YD3st9sGT-aZ0Uxcq7u7Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-02-06 08:40, Matt Thyer wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2012 3:50 AM, "Radio młodych bandytów" > <radiomlodychbandytow@o2.pl <mailto:radiomlodychbandytow@o2.pl>> wrote: > > > > I wonder if I'm the only one thinking about a decentralised package > management.... > > First, a decentralised transport layer. Torrents are faster and more > reliable than servers. > > Second, decentralised management when anybody can upload a port > directly into the system. > > > > -- > > Twoje radio > > > > Such a system would need to support traditional protocols such as FTP > & HTTP due to many corporate environments not allowing anything else. > > I'm all for a distributed system but you can't forget the corporate users. > True. While some corporations are moving to P2P software distribution already, it's a long way before it becomes standard. -- Twoje radio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3010E0.6060302>