Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 14:21:09 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: bartol@salk.edu Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with amd (was: NFS problems in -current) Message-ID: <199811192221.OAA09145@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981118162323.363A-100000@eccles.salk.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.BSF.3.96.981118162323.363A-100000@eccles.salk.edu>,
Tom Bartol <bartol@salk.edu> wrote:
>
> O.K. Here's another big clue. I had been mounting using amd. If I mount
> without amd then all is well and performance is much better also. I now
> get ~9MBps instead of ~4MBps over a 100BT segment.
Aha! The new amd uses different options to select the protocol for
NFS. I bet you still have an old amd.map file. For the new amd,
the desired options are "proto=udp,vers=2".
John
--
John Polstra jdp@polstra.com
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public."
-- H. L. Mencken
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811192221.OAA09145>