Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:44:39 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSup rewrite - aka csup Message-ID: <20050511214439.GB32174@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1165.172.16.0.199.1115842489.squirrel@172.16.0.1> References: <20050511190601.GC5631@elvis.mu.org> <20050511190956.GD5631@elvis.mu.org> <1097.172.16.0.199.1115841012.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <20050511200817.GG5631@elvis.mu.org> <1165.172.16.0.199.1115842489.squirrel@172.16.0.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:14:49PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2005 4:08 pm, Maxime Henrion said: > > Mike Jakubik wrote: >=20 > >> I just did a csup of my ports and system tree on a -CURRENT system, and > >> it seems to work fine. However it seems much slower than cvsup. This of > >> course could have been a network problem, or the cvsup server being > >> slow, but when i stopped the csup roughly half way through the /src/sys > >> tree, and retried right away with cvsup, it finished much quicker. > > > > Did you actually read my mail entirely? This is expected and described > > there. > > > > Maxime >=20 > That was the only email on the list when i read it, seems like they came > in different order. The initial email explained in detail why it was slow. Kris --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCgnzHWry0BWjoQKURAivPAKDu+WBzQ0bWOgkVrqUZvK7AIZ40CwCg1eeI e12yxZ36ykMJLPN7ufZBRiM= =3rCV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050511214439.GB32174>