Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 13:54:53 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.cisco.com> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: umount -f Message-ID: <199902101854.NAA10601@misha.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <19990210104842.A21617@relay.nuxi.com> from "David O'Brien" at "Feb 10, 1999 10:48:42 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Will it ever work as it appears it should? Currently I have (on 2.2.8)
> >
> > mi@xxx:/tmp (1032) umount -f phosphorus:/phosphorus
> > umount: /phosphorus: Device busy
>
> >From an email from Peter Wemm:
>
> In this situation, you need to do this:
> umount -f -t nfs phosphorus:/phosphorus
>
> This causes umount to stat("phosphorus:/phosphorus") (which fails) rather
> than "/mnt".
Nope:
mi@xxx:/tmp (1044) umount -f -t nfs phosphorus:/phosphorus
umount: /phosphorus: Device busy
It is not, that umount hangs, it is that it cares about the device being
busy despite `-f' flag. Or so it seems... send-pr?
-mi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902101854.NAA10601>