Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 17:25:00 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pidentd and 2.2.5-stable upgrades Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980105172245.8303Y-100000@shell.uniserve.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980105161559.25711B-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Chris Timmons wrote: > I noticed that some of my machines with pidentd's from as recently as 9/97 > required a freshly installed pidentd after the 2.2.5-stable upgrade in > order for pidentd to work (at least I think this is the scenario, we've > noticed it on a couple of machines here.) > > If you've recently upgraded to 2.2.5-stable and use pidentd you might want > to make sure that it still works - if not the most recent version in ports > seems to do the trick. > > -Chris It all depends on what you upgraded from. Sept 97 is actually quite old. Very common. I've had to rebuild pidentd a few times now. It doesn't help if you run 2.2.5-stable with 16 characters usernames either (which I do). Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980105172245.8303Y-100000>