Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:42:30 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is Stable Message-ID: <20040823124230.GA26784@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <E1BzAeh-000AxP-2T@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> References: <20040823045620.GG15251@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <E1BzAeh-000AxP-2T@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> > still considered stable. After the 5.3 release it is expected
> > 5.X will become stable. At that point I'm not sure what to call
>
> Is that the point at which this list becomes the correct place to ask
> questions about 5.X on as opposed to current ?
>
Yes. People will need to show a little tolerance both here and on
the -current mailing list for a while as people get used to it. Again
I'm afraid this isn't going to be like flipping a switch at the date
5.3 gets released and everything changes instantly. It will take a
little while for things to settle down. But that's the nature of
change/progress/etc, right? :-)
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040823124230.GA26784>