Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:19:41 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Daniel Frazier <dfrazier@magpage.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KERNCONF instead of KERNEL? Message-ID: <20010301101941.C29805@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <3A9E69E7.E4B354DE@magpage.com>; from dfrazier@magpage.com on Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:25:27AM -0500 References: <3A9E69E7.E4B354DE@magpage.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:25:27AM -0500, Daniel Frazier wrote: > I see the not in UPDATING regarding this change, but the examples=20 > further on down still use KERNEL. Could someone confirm that the > following example is now correct... >=20 > make buildworld > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DYOUR_KERNEL_HERE > make installkernel KERNCONF=3DYOUR_KERNEL_HERE > reboot (in single user) [1] > make installworld > mergemaster > reboot Yes, this is correct. KERNEL will continue to work for some time (quite possiably the entire life of the 4.x branch), but KERNCONF is perfered with KERNEL will not work in 5.x. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6npK8XY6L6fI4GtQRAl3HAKDPVUBb9VroL6U6YuNEQ3MyaLOufACaA2Rb 7Oj+l3f5FTdk0m9gqxo5Nxc= =80MP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3siQDZowHQqNOShm-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010301101941.C29805>