Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:54:46 +0000 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why would a port use its own existence as an excuse to fail install? Message-ID: <20140216175446.02ea5d8f@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20140216041454.GA46095@over-yonder.net> References: <20140216033119.GR22007@albert.catwhisker.org> <20140216034822.GK2304@over-yonder.net> <20140216041454.GA46095@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:14:54 -0600 Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > A nice thing about portmaster is that it's smarter than portupgrade. > ... > In this case, I'd guess, portmaster ... Which fails, since it's > already installed, thus... For me portupgrade did that upgrade perfectly even though I forgot to read UPDATING. pkg check reports no errors.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140216175446.02ea5d8f>