Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:20:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: haskell@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 284757] Mk/Uses/cabal.mk: support for USE_CABAL in separate Makefile.modules Message-ID: <bug-284757-16154-iTdb4BZmxJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-284757-16154@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-284757-16154@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D284757 --- Comment #2 from =C3=84lven <alster@vinterdalen.se> --- In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #1) > On the other hand, only 2 ports in the tree are currently using this appr= oach. It's a chicken-and-egg problem: I hope many (maybe, all) haskell ports will benefit from moving large USE_CABAL stances to separate module files to not= to clutter main Makefiles, just the feature needed to come first, and they will follow. > The same feature would also be useful for Rust (and probably Go) ports Rust support is already in the tree [0]. Go ports may also follow if they l= ike to. > If you want to push this further, I'd recommend adding Rust support and p= utting the patch on Phabricator for the portmgr group to review. Sorry, as a non-committer I have no access to Phabricator. Would you mind t= o do this yourself, please? I may think you also would be interested to have this land in the tree=E2=80=A6 [0] https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/Mk/Uses/cargo.mk#n17 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-284757-16154-iTdb4BZmxJ>