Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:36:39 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ), arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenBSD compatibility in cvs Message-ID: <p05200f3bba9e5a186e7f@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <xzpwuiw1dxo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzpwuiw1dxo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:56 PM +0100 3/18/03, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >The attached patch implements the OpenBSD tag, umask and dlimit >cvs configuration keywords so our cvs(1) can operate on an >OpenBSD repo without warnings. The file it affects is on the >vendor branch; should we submit this patch to the vendor or just >take the file off the branch? I'll just say that I would very much like to have the compatibility with openbsd's CVS. It is obviously better if the vendor would rapidly incorporate the patch, but if there's any snag with that process then I think the compatibility is worth taking the file off the vendor branch. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn =3D gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05200f3bba9e5a186e7f>