Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:35:31 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/linux-f8-openmotif Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20090513003531.29453ee6@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <03260409@bb.ipt.ru> References: <200905121614.n4CGEiv0012670@repoman.freebsd.org> <4A09AA55.8080108@p6m7g8.com> <03260409@bb.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Tue, 12 May 2009 21:28:06 +0400
Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:56:53 -0400 Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> > Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
> > > No PORTREVISION bump is needed.
> > > | -BUILD_DEPENDS= rpm2cpio:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/rpm
> > I thought you always had to BUMP PORTREVISION when changing DEPENDS
> > since you directly affect the resultant package ? Can you enlighten
> > me ?
>
> Two arguments:
> . the package for this port is never built;
In general, this argument is is wrong, as one can use FORCE_PACKAGES to
build them locally.
> . this dependency still (indirectly) exists since this port
> depends upon linux_base-f8 which depends upon archivers/rpm.
So the make describe output is the same?
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkoJ66MACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeUkIwCfcDEd7xZlOuAdaj3f3gFO1kx3
WAQAnRieg2tVJAcmn8UyaO7HDaQjCJgb
=R9Qm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090513003531.29453ee6>