Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Nov 1996 22:54:09 -0500
From:      Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
To:        terry@lambert.org
Cc:        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, terry@lambert.org, grog@lemis.de, chat@FreeBSD.org, smut@clem-162.dorms.tamu.edu
Subject:   Re: SCSI A/V drives
Message-ID:  <199611260354.WAA10790@hill.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199611252319.QAA23592@phaeton.artisoft.com> (message from Terry Lambert on Mon, 25 Nov 1996 16:19:29 -0700 (MST))

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

   > Okay, understood... I hadn't realized that the recal was a
   > time-consuming process.  Why does the drive logic not continuously
   > update the thermal expansion factor it uses, each time it seeks?
   Because the thermal expansion fact varies radially based on the
   current expansion minus the expansion ath the time the drive was
   formatted.

   So it isn't constant across the whole disk surface as it would be
   if the track lines were parallel instead of concentric circles.

So the calibration factor is actually a function which can't be
predicted by a single point.  Fair enough, although it would seem that
the calculations could be made from the data acquired during the
normal seeks, whether it's a single factor, multiple coefficients,
or a lookup table.

Of course, I'm talking about things I don't know, but then again, I'm
talking about things I want to understand.

Thanks,
Joel


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611260354.WAA10790>