Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:40:20 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/gdkxft Makefile ports/x11/mgapdesk Makefile ports/x11/tkgoodstuff Makefile ports/x11/xdialog Makefile ports/x11-fm/apotheke Makefile ports/x11-fonts/tkfont Makefile ports/x11-toolkits/bwidget Makefile ports/x11-toolkits/itk ... Message-ID: <20031221174020.GA729@chetwood.ru> In-Reply-To: <1071967051.56655.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200312210023.hBL0NQci009512@repoman.freebsd.org> <1071967051.56655.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003-12-20 at 19:37 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 19:23, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > > - Use canonical form (ports@FreeBSD.org) in MAINTAINER line >=20 > This falls under the sweeping commits category. Please do not change a > large number of ports like this during a slush. Joe, While it indeed falls into sweeping commits category technically=20 since it touched 105 port Makefiles, it should not have any effect=20 on the resulting packages, nor should break any of them, etc.=20 The only change was to fix various cases of wrong capitalization=20 of ports@FreeBSD.org in MAINTAINER line of the orphaned ports. Do you suggest I should back it out? ;) Sergei --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/5dsEFOxuaTulNAERAoqaAKCd5GVdlOgqdtZ7Ga42d1LGJfDwXwCfeQTl XG8uulEPZTuKG/KaqvjdgzM= =7f52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031221174020.GA729>