Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:25:38 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports tree tagging again Message-ID: <20060818182538.GB7482@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20060818122138.GF78016@underworld.novel.ru> References: <20060816123335.GA42090@underworld.novel.ru> <20060817082940.GB845@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060818122138.GF78016@underworld.novel.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:21:38PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > There are severe logistical problems: Ports are currently expected to > > build for at least 3 different src branches, with between 2 and 6 > > different architectures in each. Multiply this by over 15,000 ports > > and that process isn't going to work. And this ignores interactions > > Yeah, that's the problem we should find a solution for. Other than adding a lot more build machines and/or decreasing the number of ports, what do you have in mind? mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060818182538.GB7482>